Hi,
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Micah Cowan wrote:
>>>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>>>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>>> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
>>> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fits the bill.
>>
>> Only a dumb terminal, though :(
>
> Nope. M-x terminal is the dumb terminal. M-x term gives a fully-emulated
> terminal ("eterm").
Awesome, did not know at all! Thanks for the hinter!
Hannes
_______________________________________________
screen-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users