On Monday 24 of November 2003 21:06, bart at solozone.com wrote: > It looks a lot like another Times Roman .e g. Dutch, or Nimbus and it is a > restricted license; it looks good --- it must with those precedents -- but > why bother? besides ttf is UNRELIABLE unless the high end printers like it
I have to disagree with you - it was created from scratch for the second biggest Czech newspaper - and abandoned later for "design policy" changes. Stormtype (aka Pismolijna) is *very* high rated in (middle) Europe typos. But I agree with ttf disadvantages in printing. p.s.: remember the license of the Monotype (Microsoft) fonts and so on :))) -- Petr Vanek -------------- petr [at] yarpen [dot] cz www.yarpen.cz ---------------- Kuolema Kaikille (Paitsi Meille) ------------------------------- Today is good day to end it all
