Paul wrote: [] > but we had all hells job getting it to work correctly on little endian > machines (i.e. we needed a way to define _BIG_ENDIAN correctly). On the
I chose the test #if X_BYTE_ORDER == X_BIG_ENDIAN because it was already present in the code, in gdk-pixbuf-xlib-private.h, so the macros seemed to be supposed to be defined. Do you mean this can test positive on a little-endian machine? (I cannot try it out, I have no such beast). > testbed MacOSX box I was finding problems getting the patch to work > correctly either. What problems were these? I tried it on several MacOSX machines with several different versions of X11 or xfree86 installed. -- Martin
