> > In sodipodi I have found only one way to solve this problem. > > Open the XML-editor, and the path attribute I add a letter 'z': > > M 56.29179 32 L 46.00000 68 L 67 68 z > > > > But its really hard to find the paths they are not closed(this path are > > normally no ''stroke outline''. And it sodipodi looks like a closed (and > > filled) path. > > Cool. Thanks for advising of the workaround. > > Have you tested the same SVG via exporting from the latest Inkscape ?
Hi! I have created some image to better showing. (I have switched to the newest version of inkscape(0.37) I have created a polyline(triangle, but not closed), and I have filled it: http://www.pvvbitech.hu/dtp/closepath.svg http://www.pvvbitech.hu/dtp/closepath.png In scribus it does not appear the filled area just outline(if we dont have outline, so it appears nothing in scribus) When we look at the source of SVG: <path style="fill:#000071;fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;stroke-width:3.75;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-linecap:butt;fill-opacity:0.617188;stroke-dasharray:none;" d="M 129.56102 286.5126 L 264.88031 122.40197 L 348.37519 303.7874 " id="path574" /> Here is the approprieta line: d="M 129.56102 286.5126 L 264.88031 122.40197 L 348.37519 303.7874 " If we putting the letter 'z' at the and of line(in XML-editor inside inkscape, or vim). It close: http://www.pvvbitech.hu/dtp/closepath2.png I have egally referred some SVG docs, for this issue: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/paths.html#PathDataGeneralInformation ''A path is defined by including a 'path' element which contains a d="(path data)" attribute, where the d attribute contains the moveto, line, curve (both cubic and quadratic B?ziers), arc and closepath instructions. The M indicates a moveto, the L's indicate lineto's, and the z indicates a closepath '' More detailed is it at the 8.3.3: 8.3.3 The "closepath" command > Probably not until after 1.2 is released and the file format of Scribus > changes. > > Moreover, Scribus is not Latex and vice versa. Both are valid, but very > different ways of publishing documents. > I know the difference of scribus and latex.;) I use all the two apps. At present the better way to include some text in scribus, is it load some simple txt files. So its evident to improve ... As I use both two apps for presentation technical text at conference(scribus), and for reports(latex). I have egally readed in the archive that someone have an idea to implement a mathematical editor from OO.org. Just my two cents: I write many mathematical/engeneering docs, and I have never familiarised the way of OO.org, and MS-Office. The latex way is the best at presence. And would be more simply implement, not need GUI, just an interpreter for it. (ex: \mathcal{F}^{-1}\{f(\omega)\}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{0}^a e^{j\omega t}\,d\omega In M$-Office it cant be exactly typesetting, and it takes 5* much more time. Here is the output of this thing: http://www.pvvbitech.hu/dtp/latexPower.png ) Best regards, Khiraly
