robert wrote: >Thank you for an obviously well thought out answer. In summary (as I >understand it), the answer seems to be DTP is for combining lots of images >and text in the way you want. A word processor is for creating just text >documents, with an (at most) occassional graphic. > > > I think you're getting close, but not quite there yet.... The key element has to do with the precision with which you can and (for commercial purposes) need to control all aspects of the visual output: the typeface, space between letters, stretching or compressing the typeface, space between lines, exactly where it is placed on the page. With images, the resolution of the image, the precise color(s) which are used, and especially in regard to a commercial printing operation, in which you want to be able to exactly control the ink-printing process. Browsing through the archive at many of the extensive threads on various scribus features and printing process control will give some idea of the degree of control which is sought with DTP.
While it might seem that word processors have developed or incorporated at least some of these features, there is at least a magnitude of control and predictability that you will not see with word processing programs compared with DTP apps. As many have noted, word processors in many cases only pretend to have these features, since they are so unreliable as to be worthless. Greg Pittman
