Dnia wtorek, 28 grudnia 2004 13:55, David Purton napisa?: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 09:54:00AM +0100, Mikolaj Machowski wrote: > > Dnia wtorek, 28 grudnia 2004 08:18, Craig Bradney napisa?: > > > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 04:19, Gabriel Gazz?n wrote: > > > > At 19:04 27/12/2004, you wrote: > > > > >Our final worry is that it doesn't support proprietary color > > > > > standards such as Hexachrome or Pantone -- and likely never > > > > > will." > > > > > > > > Can't these features ever be supported via proprietary plugins in > > > > the future? I mean provide some good API planned just for that, > > > > waiting for someone to come in and do it? > > > > (perhaps I'm asking for something that's absolutely not > > > > feasible...) > > > > > > Its not about the code, its about the fee/royalties/large sums of > > > cash that need to be paid to use the systems. > > > > I understand but maybe some day Scribus will be so popular that > > commercial firm will wrote closed, not-free plugin. And some users > > will prefer to pay money for plugin to Scribus than $BIGSUM for whole > > system like Quark or InDesign. > > Hey - you can always see if Pantone would like to contribute to an open > source project... you know, it's for a good cause sort of thing... > > You can tell Pantone about "...applications critical to your success in > which the ability to use PANTONE Colors would be helpful." at this web > page: ;) > No dreaming. This would be suicidal move for them. Big players like Adobe et co. would shot them instantly. They just have treat all entities equally.
m. -- LaTeX + Vim = http://vim-latex.sourceforge.net/ Vim Universal Templates http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1078 CLEWN - http://clewn.sf.net
