Steve Herrick wrote:
>Quoting Tristan Miller <psychonaut at nothingisreal.com>:
>
>
>
>> If Scribus can make similar-looking documents
>>without too much more hassle than InDesign 1.5, then I'm willing to devote
>>the time to learning it. Comments?
>>
>>
>
>I'm a bit late answering, but for what it's worth, I came to Scribus after
>using InDesign for
>nearly two years at my day job. Check out my work page - http://www.cepad.info
>- you won't
>be able to tell which is the first edition done on Scribus, except for the
>brief mention on the last
>page.
>
I would actually be so bold as to state that they look better under
Scribus. I don't know if that's a software or an improved skill thing,
though.
