Craig Ringer wrote: >On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 23:38 +0200, Craig Bradney wrote: > > > >>Its not redundant. Importing into a frame gives you basically a rastered >>version, and importing it directly onto the canvas gives you a fully editable >>graphic. Very useful, especially the second. >> >> > >I agree. I also think that for consistency, it may be better to have >frames that can contain vector or raster SVG/EPS/PS/PDF imports in >future. This would let the user manipulate vector images the same way >they're accustomed to doing with raster images. > > May I return to my original question then - if you import via import menu rather than frame is it broken when it wraps a EPS thats wider than the page?
Calum -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20050805/49739438/attachment.html
