> >Current 1.3.2cvs is bleeding edge, in the past few weeks, about as close > > to the blade as you can be... We can only make progress and have any > > chance of moving forward with some major changes inside Scribus. So, > > track CVS if you will, make your docs with it, **but you must be prepared > > to roll with the punches**. I must say, my last magazine was done with > > 1.3.2cvs and all went fine. > > Completely respect what you are saying - if you want something stable > use 1.23 if you want to play with new features then do so at risk and > expect things to break form time to time... fine. I have very little > experience of using CVS for things... ...if I do the tracking (I assume > that means it fetches a new CVS each night) do I need to recompile it > every time? The compile porcess takes about 2 1/2 hours on my machine!
Yes you need to recompile and reinstall, but you normally do not need to make clean before running make && make install. If we (as we quite often do) touch a commonly used header file, the rebuild might get a little long some days. Investigate the use of ccache which will help cache compilation results and speed up recompiles of the same files. Craig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20051209/02fd7700/attachment.pgp
