On Wednesday 02 February 2005 10:12, Thomas R. Koll wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:15:23PM +0100, Maciej Hanski wrote: > > Now, this is really a great piece of news! Will it be possible to have > > it multilingual (at least bilingual :) from the beginning? > > You can already choose your language in the current MW versions. > At Wikipedia of course too. > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:09:56 +0100 > > > > "Thomas R. Koll" <tomk32 at gmx.de> wrote: > > > Yeah, a wiki would be nice, if you need someone to maintain it, I'm > > > quite experienced with Mediawiki. > > > About the license, the GNU FDL is quite crappy, at Wikipedia it's a > > > source of long discussions and the CC licences are usefuller. > > > > > > ciao, tom > > > > Tom, could you explain in a few words, what makes GNU FDL so "crappy" in > > comparison to Creative Commons? > > > > I went through some Creative Common pages and what looks to me at > > first glance as the biggest advantage, is, that's so easy to understand > > and to customize to ones needs. The Creative Commons Attribution > > License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ seems to be pretty > > similar to GNU FDL -- I could imagine using it as a "default" licence > > for all Scribus Wiki contents, and leaving it to every Scribus Wiki > > author to choose instead for their work the "Creative Commons > > Attribution-NonCommercial License" > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/, which prohibits the > > commercial use without authors approval . Does it sound reasonable? > > by-sa would sound better to me. > The problem of GFDL at Wikipedia is that it was meant for software > documentation and stuff like a detailed history is not possible > if you want to print wikipedia. Better find the basics of the license, > free distribution, share alike and name the authors. you can have > that with the CC too and even better, the CC is approved for European > countries in an official translation (something why I really hate the FDL). > > A wiki for a software might be a border-line case but I'd prefer the CC. > > Anyone already working on fitting the MW layout to Scriubs? I'd love to > do that job.
No.. MW is setup as you can see at wiki.scribus.net. If you want to develop a new theme and layout for it, please go ahead and keep in touch with me. It needs to be a fairly simple change when performing upgrades though. Please note the MW 1.4 betas are rolling out and it might need fixing when 1.4 is there. Craig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20050202/02c874e7/attachment.pgp
