PLinnell wrote: >On Tuesday 15 February 2005 03:04, Wesley Allen wrote: > > >>Craig Bradney wrote: >> >> >>>On Monday 14 February 2005 15:12, Craig Bradney wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Just an FYI to say that 1.2 anon CVS is down for some maintenance. >>>>Nothing serious, itll be back later on. >>>> >>>> >>>Its back.. Some minor things have changed, if you get any cvs errors, just >>>nuke your Scribus CVS dir and check it out again. I have checked it all >>>out and built it all so it is fine. Same method for checking out as >>>always. >>> >>>Craig >>> >>> >>Craig, >> What should I be looking for bug-wise; if I move to cvs from stable >>1.2.1? I'm thinking about checking it out; but i've not played with cvs >>in a bit... >> >>Wes >> >> >> >Purely bug fixes and enhancements - notably in the scripter,scripter >docs and some end user docs which have been updated in 1.2.2cvs. > >This is the stable branch. _All_ 1.2.x bugs are tested against current >CVS. > >FWIW, I've got 1.2.1 installed, but almost never use it. > >1.3.0 CVS - when it is released to the public soon _will_ be a >development branch; paraphrasing a Red Hat developer: It's got lots >of new bells and whistles and bell, but if it breaks, you get to keep >the pieces. meaning: > >Joking aside, 1.2.2cvs _is_ the most stable version you could use at >the moment IME. > >Peter > > Peter, that's a great summary, thanks!
Wes >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Scribus mailing list >Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de >http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus > >
