>On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 08:04 +0200, Peter Nermander wrote: > >> These thoughts are very much like what I have, BUT working with >> technical texts is not possible with plain text (where are my micro, >> ohm, degree etc symbols in plain ascii??). In that case I would need >> unicode text, and unfortunately I don't think authors would handle >> that. > >Really? Unicode is very well supported these days, and should be the >default of the majority of text editors. Additionally, I see few issues >with importing OO.o files personally - a template could be supplied with >all the styles they're allowed to use precreated.
Does this mean the emphasis issue could be solved by Unicode? I mean, can a database entry contain a text which contains an emphasized element (one word in italic among others in plain type for instance)? Louis > >-- >Craig Ringer > >_______________________________________________ >Scribus mailing list >Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de >http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus
