On Thursday 20 October 2005 09:37, Bart Alberti wrote: > > Gregory Pittman wrote: > > > Craig Ringer wrote: > > >> Gregory Pittman wrote: > > >>> > > I do quite a bit with LaTeX, but for archiving > > purposes I > > > > just keep the .tex file; it has everything I need for > > that purpose. > > > Absolutely. That makes perfect sense for archival. > > > > I don't necessarily think it'd be reasonable to expect to > > be able to > > > send your .tex file to a printer and have them deal with > > making it into > > > a PDF though - they'd need all the fonts and images, any > > macro packages > > > you're using, etc. ick. Archival is a very different thing > > to submission > > > to a printer, and has different requirements. That's my > > point. > > > Nobody has mentioned that dvi was supposed to be the 'device > independent printer standard. > How about sla 2 latex (both being basically text tag > systems). Surely xml is a subset of sgml? Is there a dtd for > Scribus?
No, not until the new format is completely implemented. Work on this will *start* in 1.3.2cvs after we finish the rewrite of the plugin system for loading and saving of docs. The final format may not be complete until late into 1.3.x. Craig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20051020/2d3b2300/attachment.pgp
