On Monday 03 April 2006 23:34, pixelnate wrote: > Craig Bradney wrote: > >> may change in the future. Remember, Quark wasn't really accepted by the > >> industry until v3.3, and Indesign was a steaming pile of poo for v1 and > >> v2. I cannot wait to see Scribus v3! > > > > Which is a load of crap.. ID had already pretty much taken hold of the > > market over Quark with 2. > > That is simply not the case. InDesign still does not have more > marketshare than Quark, and it didn't really take hold until it was > bundled in the CS suite. V1&2 were both originally intended for Mac OS9, > and it wasn't until Adobe shipped CS which included an OSX-only version > of InDesign that it was really embraced. There were *many* bugs in the > first two versions that kept people at bay. And FWIW, many designers > here is Texas are still loyal to Quark. Personally, I like Indesign > because it previews better than Quark does, but v7 is supposed to be > pretty slick.
Maybe in Texas.. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20060403/60282f94/attachment-0001.pgp
