Craig Bradney wrote: > > Without Qt 3.3, you can forget it, unfortunately. You will need Qt4 soon > too...
Sorry haven't kept up with Qt, does that mean we need Qt4 and Qt3.3 or just Qt4? Ta Owen
Craig Bradney wrote: > > Without Qt 3.3, you can forget it, unfortunately. You will need Qt4 soon > too...
Sorry haven't kept up with Qt, does that mean we need Qt4 and Qt3.3 or just Qt4? Ta Owen