> Martin Costabel a ?crit : > >> So your formulation may be a little clumsy, but not in contradiction >> with scribus' original definition. Times may have changed, though, and >> newer scribus web pages don't show this definition any more. A curious >> case is google's first hit on "scribus", where I can read: >> >> Scribus :: Open Source Desktop Publishing for Linux, Mac OS? X and ... >> - Mar 18 >> Layout program for Linux, similar to Adobe PageMaker, QuarkXPress or >> Adobe InDesign, except that it is published under the GNU GPL. >> www.scribus.net/ - 39k - 24 Mar 2006 - Cached - Similar pages - Remove >> result >> >> Clicking on the page URL or even on the cached page doesn't show any >> mention of Adobe etc., though, so it is somewhat mysterious where google >> got this text from. >> It probably was there. But now Scribus has matured enough it doesn't need these references. In fact one might argue that Scribus is well on the way to becoming more "famous" than any of these. How many of these high school/middle school students we hear about have even heard of DTP before Scribus? I don't think we would see Adobe saying that their products are "like" anyone else's.
Greg
