On Monday 15 May 2006 20:15, Pierre-Luc Auclair wrote: > On Monday 15 May 2006 14:11, Louis Desjardins wrote: > > > Well, I had figured that solution out, is there no way of substituting > > > (globally) the numbers of the regular font with another? I know that is > > > mixing of fonts, which should be avoided generally, but in this case > > > this solution could be prone to create errors as well, a last minute > > > change in the text, and suddenly we have both old style figures and > > > majuscle numbers in the same text. > > > > You're absolutely right pointing at the "creating errors" issue. There > > is no better way at the moment (unless something could be done with > > scripting, but I cannot advise on this). But the issue is known and > > there are plans to have a "super search & replace" function that would > > allow to handle these cases in one single operation. > > In this case, OpenType functions ? la InDesign would be much better than a > S&R. I assume it would not be that difficult, given that it seems glyphs > have standardized names (at least that's what it seems in all the fonts > I've opened so far).
This is a planned feature of the new style system. Craig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20060515/867aad2e/attachment.pgp
