> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:51 +0200, Jan Schmitz wrote: >> try to use a higher resolution of your system. maybe 1600x1200 ore >> something
Danny Brow wrote: > I'm running 1920x1200, so that's not the issue. Actually, I think you might want to try a *lower* resolution. Sounds counterintuitive, but think about it: if you set your screen size to, say, 800x600, then all your windows appear larger on the screen, and more physical pixels are used to display each item. I was meaning to try this next time I needed screenshots, but now you can be the guinea pig. Let me (us) know if it works. -- Matt Gushee : Bantam - lightweight file manager : matt.gushee.net/software/bantam/ : : RASCL's A Simple Configuration Language : matt.gushee.net/rascl/ :
