On Thursday 30 August 2007 19:28:57 Craig Ringer wrote: > Craig Bradney wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> Subject: Re: [Scribus] .sla.gz file association in Windows > >> From: Marcin Szafran <jm_sz at vp.pl> > >> To: scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de > >> Date: 30-08-2007 12:39 > >> > >> > >> Wiadomosc napisana przez Pierre Marchand, 30.08.2007 12:22, zawierala > >> > >> m.in. takie slowa: > >>>> maybe compressed Scribus' docs should have different ext (.slagz for > >>>> example - unfortunatelly slag is not quite good ;)? > >>> > >>> Maybe ".slz" ? > >> > >> good, i think :) > >> developers, what do you think about it? > > > > We have previously discussed changing the format extensions when we make > > more format changes later in the 1.3.x series, which will then have a > > second mimetype attached. (sla is vnd.scribus) > > Personally I see little utility in the use of an .sla.gz extension. Why > not just deflate the XML data and use .sla ? It should be trivial to > detect by looking at the first few bytes of the file, and many XML > libraries will do so automatically.
sla is our "vnd.scribus" format slz or whatever we decide will be the "vnd.scribus+xml" format, ie when its pure xml Craig
