On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:54:13 +0200, Craig Bradney wrote: > 1.3.5 will not be generally more stable than 1.3.4. 1.3.5 is our move to Qt4 > and within that timeframe we are fixing some issues found in 1.3.4. 1.3.5 is > a massive rewrite of a LOT of code to work with Qt4. Even though most of the > things are working in 1.3.5svn, there are a lot that are simply broken due > to the conversion and this will take time to work through. > > 1.3.3.x will remain the stable version for awhile yet and we would suggest > remaining with that. Technically, the next stable version is 1.4.0 (so yes, > another few development releases to go), but we will have to see if we again > break the mold and stabilise another odd numbered release, at this point, I > doubt it but we will see how 1.3.6 goes. > >> For me and I suspect others, the bleeds are one of the functions [..]
Does that mean that there will be no stabilized version with bleed support in the near future? I believe the scribus community is quite patient. Remember the feature freeze for 1.3.4 was 2006-11-14. With the big announcement of 1.3.4 2007-05-29 you made lots of mouths water even more. I was hoping that there would (have) be(en) a version 1.3.4.1 with the major bugs fixed. A version that one could finally recommend to others. If you are telling us to wait for 1.4 (or even 1.3.6), how long is that going to take if 1.3.4 took a year? What can the community do to help? Regards, Helge
