dlwiggers wrote: > JLuc wrote: >> Frank Swygert a ?crit : >>> How stable and functional is Scribus? Anyone here moved from PM to >>> Scribus? >> >> From my perspective, Scribus is not usable : >> >> Stable version runs slow with midly large documents, >> crashes more than wished, proposes a couple of buged basic features >> and a cripled usablity. >> >> This being said, Scribus is very ok and powerfull for most basic works >> (like a single page with text and images but not too many layers) >> or for experts being pleased to slalom between bugs and external tools. >> >> Sorry, >> JL >> >> > I concur. Add unresponsive and sometimes snotty ml. > > Lee
Hi, I think that instead of apparently biased generalizations, like the above, have a look at the 'Scribus success stories' here: http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Success_stories You can see what people can actually create with scribus. That may give you an idea what scribus can do. As for the mailing list (guess that's what ml is), I couldn't disagree any more. I've been a member of many technical mailing lists before, and this is the most tolerant and helpful one that I've seen. The only problem I see with scribus, compared with some other open source projects like inkscape, that development seems a bit slow, releases could be more frequent. Yours: Laszlo
