On Jan 7, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Hedley Finger wrote: > At Tuesday, 8/01/2008, 03:29 AM;, you wrote: >> I think that offering periodic packaged versions of the recommended >> development version would help to clear up this confusion. > > Would it be that hard? Usually packages/installers are built by > make/cmake/ant scripts.
I don't know if it would be hard or not...I haven't ever tried to create an installer. I guess I assumed there was something complicating the matter, since there don't seem to be any packaged versions of 1.3.5 available. I would be interested in learning how to package Scribus, so we could make it easier for folks to get started and taste the new features under development. If it's simple, all the better! Eric
