On Saturday 12 January 2008 10:47:30 Maciej Hanski wrote: > Maciej Hanski wrote: > > --cut-- > > > On the other side, the growing gap between 1.3.3.* and 1.3.* would > > justify much bolder difference in version numbers. I wonder, if it > > isn't time to reconsider the version numbers and make a clean cut as > > soon as possible. E.g.: > > > > * 1.3.3.11 could become the 1.4 release (stable branch, 1.3.3.10 > > deserves it, imho) > > > > * 1.3.5 could be the 1.5 release (developement branch) > > > > This move would hurt only for a short while (nothing, you cannot iron > > out with decent release notes) and spare us some confusion in the long > > run. > > --cut-- > > Hi list, > this guy has come to the same conclusion (in German): > http://www.pro-linux.de/cgi-bin/NB2/nb2.cgi?send-edit.12178.3010.2100171002 >1. > > but what do other mailing list users think about it? Let's brainstorm a > little bit about any possible pros and cons.
I dont see any reason to change now. The more people talk about it, the more it gets worked up. Nobody has worried about it from 1.3.3.1 to 1.3.3.9. Craig
