Vous (Craig Bradney) avez ?crit?: > > or 2.9 pages per minute. What's the complaint? > > Its not bad actually, 20s per generated and exported page. We can do better > though, although to really do it will need a headless Scribus (ie no screen > activity) to push faster. Throwing more CPU (Ghz, not cores) and memory > might help a little. > > Craig
What else can be considered is: one of the loaded image was in fact a PDF, so by first rasterize it in 300dpi TIFF I could have the export in half initial time ; another was a 625dpi TIFF, by first downscaling it to 300dpi I gained a bit of time too ; I stopped there but I think it would have been possible to tweak things here and there to keep the script as is and reduce the processing time a lot. Because when I tried to implement the brilliant idea by Alessandro I faced some real limitation of the scripter, first of all being the well-known lack of copy/paste (and I feel way too lazy to implement it in python!). I?ll try again today to see if I can find better with a rested head. -- Pierre Marchand
