> Hi all, > > I know this has been discussed here recently, but again: > When I started a 40-page publishing project last summer, > I wanted to have bleed settings. I got very well along > by simply doing everything with (then stable) 1.3.3.9 > After everything except bleed settings was done, I imported > the whole thing into 1.3.4, added the bleed settings > and was happy. Would this still be the way to go, > except, of course, that it's 1.3.3.11 now? > > Serious problems lay elsewhere last time: > My document got screwed up, partly due to bad > PS/PDF from external sources (will know to avoid > this now), but partly the .sla structure was > obviously corrupted. > (I helped it by creating partial documents and > assembling the resulting PDFs with other tools.) > From the changelog, it looks like _tons_ of bugs > have been shaken out between 1.3.3.9 and 1.3.3.11, > so what's your overall experience in stability > and document integrity now? > > That said, I would just like to thank the developers for > there work -- it's great software! > > Thanks, Martin
Would this be relevant to your problem? http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Bleed%2C_create_markers_and_export_a_document_to_pdf Owen
