avox wrote: >> And photos take only seconds or minutes to produce, while fonts >> take months or years.
You seem to be implying that photos are therefore easy to make and good photos are not really all that valuable as they took so little time to produce. If that's not what you meant, my apologies but that's the way it sounded to me. It's a common enough assumption but it's fairly disingenuous. Would you say someone running a 100 meter dash in 9 seconds would not be an amazing feat because it only took him 9 seconds. A good photographer spends a lot of time honing his or her skill and it's the whole package that is going into pricing. Just because each individual photograph doesn't take a long time to produce doesn't mean anyone could produce it (in that or any amount of time). Just sticking up for photographers. -- Henry Sometimes photographer
