Calum Polwart wrote: > Gregory Pittman wrote: >> Calum Polwart wrote: > >>> SVN on the other-hand MAY allow dual user edits - after all the file is >>> an XML file - so basically plain text? There are windows GUI front ends >>> for SVN - all he'd basically need to do would be click "update/commit". >>> SVN would use a local file so should be quicker to work with in terms >>> of edits and bandwidth would only by the sla file and any other >>> added/edited files not every file every time. My biggest concern (apart >>> from the XML not actually being "mergable" would be file names?) >>> >>> Looking for anyone who actually does this or something to achieve the >>> same result to chip in and tell me what they think? >>> >> I wonder if svn might be overkill for this. >
Do I take it as the conversation moved to editing text files out side of scribus - no-one (a) Thinks using SVN is a good idea (b) Has tried using SVN to comment if it screws up the files really badly! Calum
