>> This is an interesting comment. Maybe we could breifly discuss why you >> consider OpenOffice.org more "finished" than Scribus 1.3.3.12 (the stable >> version). >> ;-) Do not forget that Scribus and OpenOffice have a completely different history. OOo has its roots in a commercial product (Staroffice, which followed the stand-alone Starwriter, and I remember working using this tool back in 1993 ;-) ) which was made open-source after being aquired by Sun. So it is an ongoing development of an Office Suite that had already been complete in the 90s, with huge companies contributing to it. You can compare its history somehow to Mozilla.
Yet I think that Scribus is a rather complete tool, too - for a given workflow you can do all you need. Only to broaden that workflow, additions may be needed. Besides that, all is about performance and bug-fixing ;-) CU Lars.
