hi lars
>> I think it's best to leave it to remind yourself that this is going to >> be a rasterized PDF, >Is there a reason that Scribus handles PDF like that? Having a call to >Ghostscript translating the PDF to PS instead of pixels and placing it >would not have been much overhead, so I wonder why it is done like that. the answer is simple: it was much easier to do it that way, since ghostscript is doing all the work! but: the devs are already working on it and 135svn already has some sort of vector import of pdfs! ciao a.l.e -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/pdf-import-tp19283744p19306303.html Sent from the Scribus New mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
