hi
Peter Nermander wrote: > >> The resulting PDF would comply to PDF/X1a:2001 except that it's not >> labeled >> as such and the Output Intent (CMYK) is missing. Both exceptions will not >> alter the way the PDF is output. > > No, but, as he has written before, it alters the way the printer accepts > it. If I don't remember wrong he even tried the way you mentioned, but got > hos PDF rejected. > > So, if it is so easy to make a PDF/X1a:2001, why not just include it in > the list in Scribus? It can't be that hard to add code to label it correct > and include Output Intent = CMYK? 2-3 lines of extra code? > if you (or semebody else) has not done it yet, please fill a feature request to bugs.scribus.net with an *exact* description of the changes for the support of PDF/X1a:2001 (possibly with links to the official specification). i guess that, if it's really that straightforward, as it was mentioned here, a dev will pick it up and implement it. (in such a case, the time to program the feature is probably much smaller than time necessary to understand what has to be done: so, non-programmers contribution can be a substantial help!) have a nice sunday! a.l.e -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/The-Scribus-target---a-question-for-the-developers-tp19246383p19595468.html Sent from the Scribus New mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
