Rolf-Werner Eilert wrote: > Craig Bradney schrieb: >> >> On Apr 28, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Wesley Allen wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 28, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Craig Bradney wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:08 PM, John Culleton wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am finishing up an e-book on creating book covers with Scribus. >>>>> I have been using 1.3.3.12 as the basis although I just now managed >>>>> to get 1.3.3.13 to work on a fresh partition. That part is no worry. >>>>> But if 1.3.5 is expected to become stable in the next month or so >>>>> my e-book may as well be delayed until it comes out. Bleeds etc. >>>>> change the game considerably So, any WAGS (wild ass guesses) >>>>> as to the most likely stable date? >>>> >>>> 1.3.5 is not expected to be marked stable.. ever.. however it is >>>> expected to be released in that timeframe >>> >>> Craig, I forget - sorry - will the next "stable" be 1.3.6 or 1.4? >> >> 1.4.. stable >> 1.3.5, 1.3.6... etc will be development releases. >> > > Ok...??? So, before any 1.4 will appear, there will be 1.3.5., 1.3.6, > 1.3.7...? And will those be "stable" in the sense of 1.3.3.xx or just > for testing purposes? No, I think this is what Craig is saying -- these will all be considered development versions. When 1.4 is finally released, it will be the "new" stable.
Greg
