Jeffrey Silverman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:19 PM, John Beardmore <John at t4sltd.co.uk> wrote: >> Jeffrey Silverman wrote:
> Well certainly there is a lower limit to the required number of > pixels. Personally, for most uses, I think that lower limit is actuall > only 3MP. And you can't even get a 3MP camera these days. So for all > intents and porpoises, the statement that "pixels don't matter" is > true these days. Well, my personal use my not be "most uses", but as I'm frequently interested in the details rather than the composition of a whole frame, but increasing numbers of pixels are certainly helping here. YMMV. Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore, MSc EDM (Open), B.A. Chem (Oxon), CMIOSH, AIEMA, MEI Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/ Energy Audit, Carbon Management, Design Advice, Sustainable Energy Consultancy and Installation, Carbon Trust Standard Registered Assessor Phone: 0845 4561332 Mobile: 07785 563116 Skype: t4sustainability
