> > If i go 1.3.6 i will discard 1.3.5, so i guess i'll be better on > > 1.3.6 right? is the same branch? > > > > (kind of lost i'm right?) > > easy to get lost with this versioning system. > Yes, 1.3.6/1.3.7svn are the same branch. i think we are making it a bit more complicate than it really is, by always repeating that it is complicated... > I don't know if it's been fixed, but one thing I noticed a while ago > was that 1.3.5 refused to open a 1.3.6svn file. It was fixable by > just changing the version name in the SLA file, but still a bit > unexpected, since otherwise the file format is the same. iirc it has been fixed ciao a.l.e
- [scribus] Importing multiple pages PDF Richard Acosta
- [scribus] Importing multiple pages PDF Christoph Schäfer
- [scribus] Importing multiple pages P... Steven Dayton
- [scribus] Importing multiple pag... Christoph Schäfer
- [scribus] Importing multiple pages P... Richard Acosta
- [scribus] Importing multiple pag... a.l.e
- [scribus] Importing multiple... Margaret and George McIntosh
- [scribus] Importing multiple... Richard Acosta
- [scribus] Importing mul... Gregory Pittman
- [scribus] Importing... a.l.e
- [scribus] Impor... JLuc
- [scribus] Impor... a.l.e
- [scribus] Impor... JLuc
- [scribus] Importing mul... a.l.e
- [scribus] Importing multiple... John Culleton
- [scribus] Importing mul... a.l.e
- [scribus] Importing... John Culleton
