2010/7/3 Stewart Noy <windrunner at mweb.co.za> > > > Gregory Pittman-3 wrote: > > > > Hmm. Hard to say. If we look at it from the point-of-view of how various > > other things operate in Scribus, it might make more sense to have either > > more choices of size than S, M, or L (let's say some Max/Min then > > decimal increments, for example), or that there could be some ? spinbox > > percentage of a basic size. You run the risk of things getting too > > fiddly in the process. You can of course submit a feature request, but > > it's a little bit dependent on how easy it is to modify the current code. > > Yeah more arrow head sizes seems like it might be the easiest to implement. > I guess it's not a feature that many people have the need for. >
Please don?t underestimate the needs! The bugtracker is a straightforward way of letting know others you have a need. Just express it. There is no point at being self-censored! Cheers! Louis > > Thanks for the tip on copying and pasting though, think I'll try that > instead of reverting to an older version of Scribus. > > Keep up the good work. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Arrows-and-lines-tp29063453p29065466.html > Sent from the Scribus New mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.scribus.info/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20100704/b88e305d/attachment.htm>
