Thanks to you all! lars
---------------------- Lars Hennings 12045 Berlin, 0170 3806564, 030 85713790 Am 08.06.2010 um 01:13 schrieb Jean Ghali: > > > > lars hennings wrote: >> >> Hi, Scribus works very well. A little Photobook 17,5x17,5 cm 112 >> pages, all pages full photographies, makes a PDF-X3 of 993 MB. The >> images - jpg - makes 540 MB. Only few text, only few frames and >> groups with names. >> >> But why the PDF is so big? Shure I set full quality (zip) and 300 >> dpi. Than it is the same to set the quality of compression to middle >> or maximum. It is both the same 993 MB. May be it differs if not set >> zip. >> >> > > Hi, > > Considering the fact that your original image uses jpeg format, > there is > almost all chances that your PDF file will be bigger than expected > if you > choose zip compression as zip compression is usually less efficient > for > images than jpeg compression. Using jpeg compression with maximal > quality > will provide in almost all cases results visually similar to zip > compression with the advantage of sensibly reduced file size. > > Jean > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Test-PDF-993-MB- > tp28794660p28812024.html > Sent from the Scribus New mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > scribus mailing list > scribus at lists.scribus.info > http://lists.scribus.info/mailman/listinfo/scribus -------------- n?chster Teil -------------- Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt... URL: <http://lists.scribus.info/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20100608/8e31d2d4/attachment.htm>
