It's here where my mystical knowledge of the Scribus development cycle breaks down.
I had always assumed that 1.3 had been trunk and entered stable testing with development continuing in 1.5. (The 1.4 version number being reserved for the stable release.) But your note makes me question that assumption: > you mean : Based upon the *long* development cycle of 1.5, dont you ? is 1.3 a dedicated testing branch with all development happening in 1.5? I know that there are subtle differences between the two codebases, but I've never been motivated enough to actually figure out what those were. Cheers, Rob
