========= For me too.
2011/12/20 Gregory Pittman <gregp_ky at yahoo.com>: > On 12/20/2011 10:17 AM, Julian Robbins wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> I got caught out earlier today as I was surprised to find that Scribus >> 1.3.9svn (from Nov 2010) couldn't open a file created in Scribus >> 1.4.0rc6. This was also the case for a file created in 1.4.0rc4 too. >> >> In theory the file formats haven't really changed in this period, so has >> this message been added to protect us from the text rendering change >> which came in around 1.4.0rc4? If so its quite annoying. I understand >> why the text layout engine had to be changed, (although this itself will >> cause us many problems) but as so many people are/were using Scribus >> 1.3.5+ series and on, compared to 1.3.3.13 for its many better features >> and fixes its really going to break a lot of people's files they have >> created just 6 months earlier !! >> >> Is this really sensible behaviour ? I totally appreciate that 1.3.5+ and >> 1.4.0rc are not 'stable' releases, but as you know many users were using >> it anyway as 1.3.3.13 is so old now, and that we were encouraged to use >> it by many (including myself) on the mailing list. >> > This has happened before. The workaround is to simply open the SLA file in a > text editor and substitute 1.3.9svn for the 1.4.0whatever you have in the > Scribus Version variable, then save. At least this has worked for me many > times. > > Greg > > > ___ > Scribus Mailing List: scribus at lists.scribus.net > Edit your options or unsubscribe: > http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus > See also: > http://wiki.scribus.net > http://forums.scribus.net -- H?lio Jos? Santiago Ferreira Linux User #384101
