On 2/17/11 12:03 AM, Jos? Antonio Rocha wrote: > 2011/2/16 a.l.e<ale.comp_06 at xox.ch> > >> this means that scaleImage() is probably also "broken" and should be fixed >> the same way as getImageScale() is. >> > This is true. > > I do some Dexter's Lab jobs here, and find why scaleImage() is deprecated: > it scale at 72-points-base. > > getImageScale() works in the same manner. If a image is at 72 DPI, > getImageScale() will return (1.0, 1.0). > If a image is at 144 DPI, will return (0.5, 0.5), and so on yep, setImageScale() is what you should be using.
imo, it's a bug one can't use the result from getImageScale() and pass it to setImageScale(). creating a patch also for the existing (but deprecated) imageScale() should allow existing script to keep on working and make future scripts saner! ciao a.l.e
