On 2/17/11 5:04 PM, John Culleton wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2011 05:29:02 Ond?ej N?me?ek wrote: >> Dne 16.2.2011 11:48, a.l.e napsal(a): >>> hi ond?ej, >>> >> > (...) >>> and since most people are not aware of how badly development >>> versions of scribus can break (if even if most of the time work >>> almost perfectly), we should be very careful when suggesting that >>> a feature is in the development branch! >>> >>> ciao >>> a.l.e >> It's true, I should warn user against careless use of development >> version. > Technically 1.3.9 and 1.4.0 are still in development. Yet most > experienced users abandoned 1.3.3.14, the last "stable" version, long > ago. > > I use 1.5.0 not through choice but through necessity. It is the only > version that will produce PDF X/1-a:2001 files. I am grateful that > someone stuck that pdf format in for 1.5.0. It will be six month to a > year I estimate before that pdf format is available in a "stable" > version of Scribus. > > I look forward to the official release of 1.4.0. Then we can reverently > lay 1.3.3.14 to rest, and allow newbies to enjoy the features > introduced in more recent versions.
john, we were talking about being careful when suggesting that feature is in 1.5.0svn... thanks a.l.e
