On John Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:17:59 -0500, John Culleton wrote: > > On Monday 21 February 2011 12:52:35 Rob Oakes wrote: > > Hi Drw, > > > > > > I personally don't care for either Arial or Times New Roman. I > > think they are significantly overused. > >
[snip] > > Cheers, > > > > Rob Oakes > > I agree. > [snip] > Second, because Times is the default for > MSWord it is easily recognizable as the product of an amateur > typographer. So I suggest something outside the Microsoft Windows > collection, such as Bitstream Charter, Minion, Adobe Garamond or > Sabon. > -- > John Culleton That is a reason not to use a font? Because the commoners use it? I would think that the work of an amateur typographer will look amateurish whichever font he uses. Similarly, I would expect the work of the professional to look professional regardless. Regards, Alias John Brown.
