On 1/31/11 5:22 PM, Gregory Pittman wrote: > On 01/31/2011 11:02 AM, a.l.e wrote: >> >> just one thought: if you put any condition on the wiki which forbids me >> to commercially print something based on my contributions, i will remove >> all my contributions and refrain from further contributing. >> (basically, anything less liberal than cc-by is in my eyes a no-go for a >> community contributed wiki). >> >> ... i guess that the reason is quite easy to understand... > > well, I think we can be as liberal as the CC license, yet allow for a > mixture of licenses on the wiki, and allow for licensing to be changed > as we (the collective and individual authors) see fit. I see this as a > problem with the CC license as it exists. > > I think we want the information to be free for any personal use, but not > published without the author's permission -- I think most of us are > pretty free with allowance for someone to do what they want, but at the > least you want some recognition. >
The wiki is and will be freely usable, apart from certain tagged pages. Craig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 259 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.scribus.info/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20110131/a7a730d3/attachment.pgp>
