On 09/30/2011 11:00 PM, Mike Sleger wrote: >> I would arrange the versions so the latest ones are at the top of the list >> and the newer ones at the bottom. You want the latest information to be the >> first links a user sees. >> > > My bad - I was in a hurry. The newest versions should be at the top of the > list, and the older versions should be lowest on the list. People shouldn't > have to look around for the latest version to download - it should be the > first download link they see. >
The problem is, for example, right now we don't want new users to get 1.5.0, which is a newest version. We are currently in a transition period, where 1.3.3.14 is the current stable, yet about to be eclipsed by 1.4.0, which is nearly ready. Once 1.4.0 is ready, then it will remain the stable version and recommended one for some time. Greg
