On 03/04/2012 18:54, Craig Bradney wrote: > On 4/3/12 7:52 PM, John Beardmore wrote: >> On 03/04/2012 18:45, Craig Bradney wrote: >>> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, John Beardmore wrote:
>> So given that windows would really need a completely different >>mechanism, what would be appropriate and are there any >> candidates ? >> > > Why would windows need a different mechanism? "Mechanism" might not have been the best choice of word. I'm not suggesting the use of divining rods or anything, but specifically, I understood that aspell wasn't a contender for windows these days, even though there had been a port in the past ? > Not only do I not see why we would need a different > mechanism, but enchant is (was?) supposed to interface to the >natively installed system under > Windows, Linux or OSX, etc. Good, but at the moment we use aspell on the platforms where it is supported, rather than enchant ? Or have I misunderstood ? Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore,MSc EDM (Open),B.A. Chem (Oxon),CMIOSH,CEnv,MIEMA,MEI Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/ Registered Office: 181 Belper Road, Stanley Common, Ilkeston. DE7 6FT Company Reg: 4441097, VAT Number: 797 2239 85, MCS: ELC54087. Energy Audit, Carbon Management, Design Advice, Sustainable Energy Consultancy and Installation, Carbon Trust Standard Registered Assessor Transition Training and Consultancy Energy Resilience Assessor Phone: 0845 4561332 Mobile: 07785 563116 Skype: t4sustainability
