On Apr 10, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Gregory Pittman wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 08:26 AM, a.l.e wrote: >> >> so, the problem is not that one has to contribute back to scribus (which >> could be done with a standard OPL license... > > http://opencontent.org/openpub/ > > I don't see the OPL as being substantially different. > > Greg The placement of the doc package in the non-free Debian archive is not arbitrary. The optional OPL restriction on printing violates the DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines), which are not negotiable. Regards, Alex Scribus Debian maintainer
