On 4/12/12 11:22 PM, Murray Strome wrote: > I have looked at this issue before. I cannot understand why you do not try to > change the documents license to Creative Commons. While the GPL is fine for > Free Open Source Software (FOSS), in my opinion, it is far too onerous for > documentation. In particular, it requires a full copy of the GPL to be > included whereas CC only requires a link to the website. Including the full > GPL for a 300 page book is fine, but for a 10-30 page tutorial, this is > ridiculous!!! > > Even if a complete rewrite of the documentation were to be required (and I > may be able to help with the English version if that is desired), I really > think you should get away from the GPL. >
Its not GPL'd.. its OPL'd Craig
