On 08/27/2012 08:09 AM, Sveinn ? Felli wrote: > ?ann m?n 27.?g? 2012 11:55, skrifa?i Gregory Pittman: >> On 08/27/2012 07:41 AM, Sveinn ? Felli wrote: >>> ?ann m?n 27.?g? 2012 10:12, skrifa?i ale rimoldi: >>>> ihi sveinn, >>>> >>>>> Can confirm these extra ../../../ in my .sla everywhere I >>>>> did drop a file onto an image-frame. Images directory is a >>>>> subdirectory of the .sla >>>>> >>>>> Scribus Version 1.4.1 >>>>> 30 April 2012 >>>>> Build ID: C-C-T-F-C1.10.2-64bit >>>>> LinuxMint 13 - based on Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS (Precise Pangolin) >>>>> >>>>> Any cure for this ? >>>> >>>> do you have any symlinks around? >>>> >>>> ciao >>>> a.l.e >>>> >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> Figured it out right after sending the mail. >>> >> >> You might want to think about using Collect for Output on a given >> project, so that copies of images end up in a project folder. >> >> Greg > > I surely do, after the project matures a bit more. But I'm just > reopening the same project in the same application as was showing me the > images just a couple of days before. > > It's not a big deal, but could be frustrating to new users. Still there > seems to be problems with symlinks, maybe it's a problem in Nautilus or > in Scribus. > > While we're at it; I'm sure it would be appreciated having the file path > info available on the Image-tab in Properties panel; it being editable > would be an orgy.
Ultimately, I think it's because Scribus uses relative rather than absolute pathnames. This is also why things get messed up when you move an SLA file but not its images. Greg
