Richard Foley <rich.inud at naktiv.net> writes, in http://www.naktiv.net/books/wnbr/publishing.html:
> There's a world of difference between saying: "the PDF is rejected as > non-compliant!" and the far more helpful: "the PDF is rejected as > non-compliant BECAUSE ...". I have similar experiences with a CD printing company. Several times they rejected the PDF's saying they were not okay, but up to this very moment I don't have the faintest idea why not. When the CDs were delivered, it turned out they had somehow removed (forgotten?) the name of the group, our logo, on the cover. It was there in the PDF's I sent, and in the proofs I received. Well, they fixed it and we had to manually change the booklets in 500 CDs. Later we found out that while fixing the logo, they managed to change a hyphen to an asterisk somewhere else in the text of the booklet. Given that they could (would?) not tell me what was wrong with my PDF, I draw the conclusions: 1. My artwork was OK. 2. They are incompetent. 3. Gonna find another CD printer. -- Johan
