Hi William, > > > > It should be clear by now that a simple colour number like "PMS 100" isn't > > really helpful to anyone > > Excellent post.
Thank you! > > I would like to disagree somewhat here and add a feature suggestion. > > The one publishing application which got colour right was Cerilica's Truism Never heard of it. Do you have a link? > --- it used individual ink definitions instead of multiple ones, and instead, > had a concept of ``substrate'' w/ attendant colour and ink absorption > characteristics at the page level. > > This allowed one to define a spread has having two _different_ types of paper > (which often happens when one has a cross-over ad at the inside front (or > back) and first (or last) pages of a magazine) and to have the ad previewed > on-screen as it would actually print. > > One could also do coloured paper and preview how the ink would appear on it, > or separations w/ arbitrary ink (an amazing example I saw once was a jeans > catalog printed in blue and brown which looked amazingly lifelike despite > being printed w/ only 2 inks --- this inspired me to do a bell pepper > vegetable display box once using red and green inks which we mixed to create > brown so as to make a quite nice print of a full-colour photograph despite > using only 2 inks). This is all extremely tricky, because one has to ask at which level this can be implemented. Is it the provider of digital colour swatches? The design program? The print operator? IMHO, it's up to the operator and versatile printing software to handle this issue. Designers' options are fairly limited in this regard. Christoph
