I agree, all assumptions are usually bad, by definition :) and I was just owning up to the mistake being mine, for making the assumption in the first place. However, I still thought the developers might like to know about the issue, hence my report.
-- Ciao Richard Foley Supporting Naked Activities http://www.naktiv.net On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:13:01PM +0200, Peter Nermander wrote: > > I did not notice the change at first, as I had *assumed* the two versions > > of > > the same program would not behave differently, and sent the file to the > > > > That's not a very good assumption to do. What if an older version of a > program has a bug affecting how the final result looks? Should the > developers leave that bug in place to make sure older documents don't > change? I think it's better they fix the bug, even if it means it will > "break" a lot of older documents. > > I am not sure if this is the case for you, but it has been the case before. > > > /Peter > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20140407/73b0b63a/attachment.html> > ___ > Scribus Mailing List: scribus at lists.scribus.net > Edit your options or unsubscribe: > http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus > See also: > http://wiki.scribus.net > http://forums.scribus.net
