On 04/11/2014 08:17 AM, Peter Nermander wrote: >> I'm sure you are right about the "original" meaning of non-breaking >> spaces. Let >> me say it other words: It would be nice to have two different kinds of >> spaces: >> one with fixed width and a streching one. It doesn't matter if you call it >> > > There are plenty to choose from: > > https://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/chars/spaces.html > I think the important question is about what happens to a non-breaking space with full justification. Is it subject to being widened? If so, I think Scribus should exempt these from any stretching.
Greg
